Core Financial Performance: Q2 2026 Earnings Execution
To understand the resilience of Leidos, one must analyze the sheer volume of capital flowing through the enterprise and the efficiency with which the company converts recognized revenue into free cash flow.
Top-Line Growth and Profitability
In the second quarter ending July 3, 2026, Leidos generated top-line and bottom-line figures that comfortably exceeded Wall Street expectations. The company serves as a prime example of how disciplined cost controls can preserve margins even when high-margin segments face temporary contractions.
Q2 2026 Financial Matrix: Total Revenue: $4.56 billion, representing a 7.2% year-over-year increase (SEC Filings) [cite: 7, 23, 24]. Organic Revenue Growth: 4.0% year-over-year (SEC Filings) [cite: 7, 24, 25]. Adjusted EBITDA: $631 million, yielding a 13.8% margin (compared to 15.2% in the prior year). EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) serves as a proxy for the company's core operational cash profitability (Leidos PR) [cite: 7, 24]. Non-GAAP Diluted Earnings Per Share (EPS): $3.26, a 2% year-over-year increase, beating the consensus estimate of $2.91 by $0.35. Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) metrics adjust standard accounting figures to exclude one-time or non-operational costs, providing a clearer view of core performance (Financial Media) [cite: 7, 8, 23]. GAAP Net Income: $356 million (or $2.81 per diluted share), a 9% year-over-year decline (Leidos PR) [cite: 7, 24].
The divergence between the GAAP net income decline and the Non-GAAP EPS increase is a critical starting point for equity analysis. The GAAP figure was burdened by $29 million in discrete costs tied to the recent $2.4 billion acquisition of ENTRUST Solutions Group, integration expenses, and a pending joint venture involving security-related businesses with Analogic Corporation (GovCon Wire) [cite: 16, 20, 26, 27]. Furthermore, the prior-year comparison was unusually difficult, as Q2 2025 included a one-time $25 million insurance reimbursement for legal costs (GovCon Wire) [cite: 7, 20]. When these non-operational and non-recurring items are stripped away, the core engine of Leidos is running hot. The 4% organic growth metric is arguably the most vital indicator of enterprise health; it confirms that Leidos is scaling its existing portfolio of contracts, winning new task orders, and out-competing rivals for incumbent work independent of its M&A activities (Leidos PR) [cite: 7, 21].
The Cash Flow Conversion Engine
The most staggering data point from the Q2 2026 earnings release is the company's cash generation profile. Earnings per share is fundamentally an accounting construct, susceptible to non-cash expenses like depreciation and amortization. Cash flow, however, represents the actual liquidity extracted from the business cycle.
Q2 2026 Cash Flow Metrics: Operating Cash Flow (OCF): $793 million (a Q2 record) (Leidos PR) [cite: 7, 22, 24]. Free Cash Flow (FCF): $761 million (Leidos PR) [cite: 7, 24]. Free Cash Flow Conversion Ratio: 185% (Leidos PR) [cite: 7, 24, 27]. Capital Expenditures (CAPEX): $32 million (Leidos PR) [cite: 9, 24, 27].
Leidos achieved an astonishing 185% free cash flow conversion ratio in the quarter, meaning that for every dollar of adjusted net income, the company generated $1.85 in pure free cash. This was heavily supported by favorable working-capital movements, which contributed $329 million to the operating cash flow, contrasting sharply with a $164 million use of cash in the preceding quarter (SEC Filings) [cite: 28]. The company operates a highly capital-light business model; targeting capital expenditures at roughly 1.0% to 1.5% of total revenues ensures that the vast majority of operating cash flows cleanly to the bottom line (Leidos PR) [cite: 29].
Full-Year 2026 Guidance Revisions
Armed with this record cash generation and a massive $48.7 billion backlog (of which $10.2 billion is funded), Leidos management raised the floor on its full-year 2026 outlook for the second consecutive quarter (Leidos PR) [cite: 20, 24].
Revenue: Raised to a range of $18.20 billion to $18.40 billion (increasing the lower bound by $200 million) (GovCon Wire) [cite: 7, 20, 25]. Non-GAAP EPS: Raised to a range of $12.20 to $12.50 (increasing the lower bound by $0.10) (GovCon Wire) [cite: 7, 20, 25]. Operating Cash Flow: Raised to approximately $1.85 billion (an increase of $50 million) (GovCon Wire) [cite: 7, 20, 25]. Adjusted EBITDA Margin: Maintained at the mid-13% level (Leidos PR) [cite: 7, 25].
By raising the lower bounds of its guidance, management has effectively narrowed the cone of uncertainty for the remainder of the fiscal year. CFO Chris Cage noted that implied free cash flow guidance is up roughly $150 million, given that total CapEx for the year is now expected to be closer to $250 million (Leidos PR) [cite: 25]. Crucially, management achieved this guidance hike despite incorporating known headwinds in the health segment, demonstrating profound confidence in the defense and intelligence divisions to carry the weight. On an organic basis, excluding the health segment, Leidos expects the rest of its portfolio to grow revenues by approximately 7% and adjusted EBITDA by 19% in 2026 (Earnings Transcript) [cite: 30, 31].
Segment Breakdown: Defense Dominance vs. Health Headwinds
Leidos reports across distinct segments—Defense, Health, Civil (Homeland), and Intelligence. In Q2 2026, the underlying narrative was defined by the aggressive acceleration of the defense portfolio acting as a counterbalance to regulatory friction in the health portfolio.
The Defense Sector: Reaping the Rewards of Open Architecture
The defense segment was the undeniable star of the quarter. While overall corporate book-to-bill sat at a healthy 1.1x (with $4.9 billion in net bookings), the defense segment alone posted an astronomical 2.2x book-to-bill ratio for the quarter and a 1.9x ratio on a trailing twelve-month basis (Leidos PR) [cite: 8, 22, 24, 25, 32].
Catalysts for Defense Growth: 1. Low-Cost Containerized Munitions (LCCM): Leidos secured a framework agreement with the Department of Defense valued at over $1 billion to deliver 3,000 LCCMs by 2030 (Leidos PR) [cite: 22, 32]. This marks a definitive shift for Leidos from purely advisory and IT services into high-value, hardware-software integrated kinetic systems. 2. Unmanned Systems and Space Payloads: The company secured a testing-phase slot on the U.S. Navy's next-generation Medium Unmanned Surface Vessel (MUSV) and won contracts to provide sensor payloads for 18 additional Golden Dome missile-warning satellites (Leidos PR) [cite: 16, 22, 32]. 3. Open Architecture Leadership: At the U.S. Army's Operation Jailbreak Hackathon, Leidos engineers successfully demonstrated open-architecture interoperability, rapidly deploying open APIs that integrated non-Leidos systems with their hardware (Leidos PR) [cite: 21, 22, 32]. The Pentagon is actively rebelling against proprietary "vendor lock-in," demanding systems that can communicate across platforms. 4. Strategic AI Partnerships: Leidos announced a partnership with CoreWeave for secure cloud artificial intelligence and launched its new "Parcata" software tool. These software-centric, outcome-based fixed-price models offer structural margin expansion opportunities beyond traditional cost-plus government contracting (Leidos PR) [cite: 21, 22].
Management expects the defense segment to post high single-digit growth for the full year. Furthermore, if one excludes the airborne Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) business—which is currently in a transition phase—the core defense segment is projected to grow by double digits in 2026, setting a powerful launch point heading into 2027 (Earnings Transcript) [cite: 8, 30].
The Health Sector: Navigating LSI Disaggregation and Contractual Suspensions
Leidos has historically differentiated itself from pure-play defense contractors (like General Dynamics or Northrop Grumman) through its massive, highly profitable Health segment. However, this segment is currently navigating two severe, structural headwinds.
1. Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) Incentive Suspensions The most immediate risk to Leidos's near-term profitability is the suspension of performance incentive payments in the VBA's Medical Disability Examination (MDE) business. The VA suspended these incentive payments to all vendors from July 1 through the remainder of 2026 (GovCon Wire) [cite: 20, 22, 33]. Compounding this margin pressure, health revenues contracted as a fourth vendor ramped up operations on the VBA disability exams, diluting Leidos's volume (GuruFocus) [cite: 17, 22, 31].
The Next Logical Question: Why were these payments suspended? The suspension was directly catalyzed by a blistering Government Accountability Office (GAO) audit (GAO-25-107483) and VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) findings. The reports revealed that the VA's Medical Disability Examination Office awarded $2.3 million in overpayments to private contractors due to massive breakdowns in incentive calculations and a lack of written procedures for quality checks (GAO Report) [cite: 34, 35]. Crucially, the OIG found that multiple vendors consistently fell below the required 92% accuracy threshold—risking incorrect or delayed disability claims for veterans—yet errors were not corrected, and vendors continued receiving unearned financial rewards without facing contractual penalties (GAO/OIG Reports) [cite: 35, 36, 37]. In response to this lack of accountability, the VA initiated the suspension to overhaul its invoice validations and implement new, stricter monetary disincentives (VA News) [cite: 37, 38].
Wall Street analysts estimate that the VA medical disability exam contract generates roughly $2 billion of 2026 sales for Leidos at a margin exceeding 35%, representing approximately 30% of the company's total earnings per share (Financial Media) [cite: 17]. Consequently, management warned that health segment margins will likely dip below 20% in the fourth quarter of 2026 (down from 24.1% in the first half) (Financial Media) [cite: 17]. The entire contract is slated for a massive recompete in early 2027, which remains the single largest overhang on the stock (GovCon Wire) [cite: 20].
2. The MHS Genesis Transition Leidos is the primary architect and Lead Systems Integrator (LSI) for MHS Genesis, the Department of Defense's massive electronic health record (EHR) system that connects nearly 10 million beneficiaries across the DOD and VA. Originally a $4.3 billion contract awarded in 2015, its value swelled to approximately $5.5 billion (Nextgov) [cite: 39, 40]. Historically, the Defense Health Agency (DHA) utilized Leidos to manage the entire ecosystem, which includes Oracle Health (formerly Cerner), Philips North America, American Well Corp (Amwell), Henry Schein, and Solventum (Washington Technology) [cite: 18].
However, citing reduced cost transparency and duplicative layers of administration, the DHA has formally signaled its intent to end Leidos's run as the sole integrator. Under a new modular model in compliance with Executive Order 14222, the DHA will contract directly with the underlying software providers to eliminate integrator pass-through costs (SAM.gov) [cite: 18, 41, 42].
Philips (Tele-critical care): Transitioning away from Leidos by July 2026. This removes Leidos's management over a sub-award previously valued at approximately $17.5 million (HigherGov) [cite: 18, 43]. Amwell (Telehealth): Transitioning by July 2026. This transition represents the disaggregation of a contract historically worth up to $180 million, a shift that already caused a Q4 revenue hit for Amwell due to DOD cutbacks (Telecare Aware) [cite: 18, 44]. Oracle Health (Core EHR): Transitioning by November 2026. Oracle represents the foundational architecture of the massive MHS Genesis ecosystem, meaning the core integration revenue for this multi-billion dollar platform will structurally vanish from Leidos's income statement (Washington Technology) [cite: 18, 42].
While this represents a long-term structural reduction in Leidos's scope, the reality of government IT migrations provides a medium-term cushion. The DHA realized that MHS Genesis requires at least three more years to safely migrate to the cloud, particularly following heightened security concerns sparked by the 2024 Change Healthcare ransomware attack (DefenseScoop) [cite: 40]. As a result, the Pentagon is preparing a $1.13 billion to $1.5 billion sole-source bridge extension for Leidos to continue acting as the integrator through at least July 2028 (Nextgov) [cite: 40, 45]. Therefore, while the long-term role of Leidos in MHS Genesis will diminish, the immediate cash flows are secure.
Capital Allocation, Dividend Policy & Yield Analysis
For an equity investor, the manner in which a mature, low-capital-intensity business allocates its free cash flow is paramount. Leidos employs a balanced capital allocation strategy that distributes value through debt reduction, share repurchases, and a consistently growing dividend (Leidos PR) [cite: 7, 21].
Dividend Policy, History, and Yield Mechanics
As a traditional C-Corporation defense and government services contractor, Leidos evaluates its dividend sustainability using Free Cash Flow (FCF) and Operating Cash Flow (OCF).
Dividend Metrics: Annual Dividend: $1.72 per share, distributed in quarterly installments of $0.43 per share (Investor Relations) [cite: 2, 4, 5]. Dividend Yield: Approximately 1.40% to 1.41% based on a Q2 stock price range of $122 - $123 (Investor Relations) [cite: 2, 3, 4]. Earnings Payout Ratio: A highly conservative 15.7% to 16.04% (Investor Relations) [cite: 2, 3, 4]. Cash Flow Payout Ratio: Approximately 10% to 12% (Investor Relations) [cite: 1, 2]. Dividend Growth History: Leidos has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years, boasting a 10-year annualized dividend growth rate of roughly 3.0% to 4.2% (Investor Relations) [cite: 1, 3, 6].
Leidos's dividend is incredibly well-protected. Paying out only 16% of earnings and 12% of cash flow ensures that the dividend is insulated against macro-economic shocks, government shutdowns, or individual contract losses.
Share Repurchases and M&A Discipline
During Q2 2026, Leidos used $423 million in financing activities. This included returning $127 million directly to shareholders ($55 million via the quarterly dividend and $72 million in share repurchases) (Leidos PR) [cite: 24, 27]. By executing these repurchases, Leidos effectively reduced its outstanding share count, combatting stock-based compensation dilution (SEC Filings) [cite: 7].
Furthermore, having exhausted its prior buyback authorization, the Board of Directors initiated a new repurchase authorization (Leidos PR) [cite: 22]. When questioned about the potential for aggressive buybacks given the stock's discounted valuation, CEO Tom Bell concurred, stating, "We agree that the valuation isn't where it should be, and we're working hard to correct that" (Earnings Transcript) [cite: 22].
Crucially, management signaled a disciplined, highly cautious approach to Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) in the current environment. Bell noted that current M&A targets in the defense tech space are "very expensive" relative to Leidos's own valuation multiples, limiting inorganic growth opportunities (GuruFocus) [cite: 22, 29, 31]. Instead of overpaying for growth, Leidos chose to aggressively pay down debt.
Balance Sheet Health: Leverage, Maturities, and Coverage
A persistent risk for serial acquirers in the government services sector is the accumulation of unmanageable leverage. Leidos has historically utilized debt to fund transformative acquisitions. However, the Q2 2026 balance sheet indicates a rapid deleveraging cycle.
Liquidity and Leverage Profiles
At the close of Q2 2026, Leidos reported: Total Debt: $6.0 billion (SEC Filings) [cite: 7, 8, 24]. Cash and Cash Equivalents: $748 million (SEC Filings) [cite: 7, 8, 24]. Gross Leverage Ratio: 2.5x (down steadily from peak acquisition levels) (GuruFocus) [cite: 8, 9, 25, 31]. Net Leverage Ratio: 2.1x (SEC Filings) [cite: 9].
In a testament to its record cash flow generation, Leidos paid off the remaining $300 million in commercial paper tied to recent acquisitions during the quarter (Leidos PR) [cite: 7, 24, 29, 31, 46]. The company's short-term liquidity is robust; current assets of $5.25 billion easily cover current liabilities of $3.22 billion, yielding a current ratio of approximately 1.6x (SEC Filings) [cite: 28].
Debt Maturities and Interest Coverage
Leidos boasts an incredibly favorable debt maturity profile. The company has explicitly stated that it has no near-term debt obligations, with its next significant tranche of long-term debt maturities not beginning until 2028 (SEC Filings) [cite: 9, 10, 47, 48]. This maturity runway completely shields the company from the current "higher-for-longer" interest rate environment, as they are not forced to refinance legacy cheap debt at today's elevated yields.
Furthermore, the company's interest coverage ratio is exceptionally strong. For the quarter, interest expense was $69 million (SEC Filings) [cite: 11]. Against an adjusted EBITDA of $631 million, Leidos operates with a 9.1x interest coverage ratio, implying that the company generates more than nine times the operating profit required to service its debt burden.
Valuation: Multiples & Peer Benchmarking
The central paradox of Leidos in 2026 is its valuation. Despite best-in-class operating margins (11.8% to 13.8%), a $48.7 billion backlog, and an FCF conversion ratio of 185%, the market is heavily discounting the stock. This is likely an over-penalization for the known risks in the Health segment, creating a potential value arbitrage opportunity.
Absolute Valuation Metrics
Based on the midpoint of management's revised 2026 EPS guidance ($12.35) and a stock price near $123.00, Leidos trades at a forward P/E multiple of approximately 10.0x to 11.2x (Financial Media) [cite: 14, 15, 16, 23].
When adjusting for the company's capital structure (incorporating its $6.0 billion in debt and $748 million in cash), Leidos trades at an Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) multiple of roughly 8.8x to 9.6x (Seeking Alpha) [cite: 12, 13, 16]. This is significantly below its 10-year historical median of 13.5x (Financial Media) [cite: 13].
From a cash perspective, Leidos generated $761 million in FCF in a single quarter. Annualizing this cash flow generation against a market capitalization of ~$15.4 billion to $16.3 billion results in an astronomical Free Cash Flow Yield approaching 12% (Seeking Alpha) [cite: 8, 14, 16].
Peer Benchmarking
To contextualize this valuation, we must stack Leidos against its primary government IT and defense tech peers. Comparative data illustrates that despite boasting the highest operating margins among its peer group (13.8%), Leidos trades at one of the lowest valuation multiples (9.6x EV/EBITDA), highlighting the market's heavy penalization for ongoing health segment transitions. The table below highlights the "conglomerate discount" applied to Leidos.
| Metric | Leidos (LDOS) | General Dynamics (GD) | CACI Int. (CACI) | Booz Allen (BAH) | SAIC | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Absolute Revenue | $17.2B - $18.4B | $53.8B (TTM) | $9.57B (TTM) | $11.2B (FY26) | $7.40B (TTM) | | Operating Margin | 13.8% (Adj. EBITDA) | 10.4% | 10.0% | 9.2% - 11.9% | 8.1% - 8.9% | | EV / EBITDA | 8.8x - 9.6x | 14.1x - 14.9x | 14.8x | 9.0x - 10.1x | 10.5x | | Forward P / E | 10.0x - 11.2x | 19.5x | 25.4x | 11.5x | 12.3x - 14.3x | | Total Backlog | $48.7 Billion | $136.5 Billion | $32.8 Billion | $38.0 - $39.0 Billion | $22.1 Billion |
Data compiled from Q2 2026 reporting and TTM metrics (Financial Media) [cite: 16, 24, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57].
1. General Dynamics (GD) General Dynamics generated one of its strongest defense and aerospace quarters in years, backed by a massive $136.5 billion backlog and robust 10.4% operating margins (Financial Media) [cite: 51, 52, 58]. The market rewards GD's pure-play defense scale with a premium 14.1x EV/EBITDA and 19.5x forward P/E multiple (Stockrow) [cite: 52, 56, 59]. While Leidos is roughly a third the size by revenue, it generates superior operating margins at a significantly cheaper multiple.
2. CACI International (CACI) CACI is the darling of the sector, commanding a massive premium (14.8x EV/EBITDA and 25.4x P/E) due to its aggressive 10-14% top-line growth and pure-play exposure to high-margin intelligence and defense cyber space (Investor Relations) [cite: 49, 50, 53, 60]. CACI pays no dividend. While CACI wins on top-line momentum and boasts a 10.0% operating margin, Leidos is significantly cheaper and offers superior absolute cash generation and a robust dividend (Financial Media) [cite: 61, 62].
3. Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) BAH is a pure-play consulting and advisory firm. Despite previous high multiples, BAH has faced recent revenue growth challenges and pressure in its civil sector, pushing its EV/EBITDA multiple down to approximately 9.0x to 10.1x and its P/E to 11.5x (Forbes) [cite: 49, 57, 63, 64, 65]. Leidos outperforms BAH in LTM revenue growth and operating scale, while trading at a comparably depressed multiple (Financial Media) [cite: 55, 64, 66].
4. Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC) SAIC is Leidos's most direct value-comp. SAIC is smaller (~$7.4 billion in TTM revenue) and currently struggling with a shrinking backlog ($22.1B) and flat-to-negative revenue growth (Financial Media) [cite: 54, 67]. While SAIC trades at a similarly depressed EV/EBITDA multiple (10.5x), Leidos is the fundamentally superior enterprise. Leidos boasts more than double the revenue, vastly superior margins (13.8% vs 8.1-8.9%), and a much larger backlog ($48.7B vs $22.1B) (Financial Media) [cite: 54, 60, 67, 68].
Risks, Red Flags, and Open Questions
While the Q2 2026 data presents a compelling bullish thesis rooted in valuation and cash flow, an objective analysis requires acknowledging the severe, un-priced risks inherent in Leidos's current trajectory.
1. The Veterans Affairs (VA) Recompete "Cliff"
The single largest red flag hovering over Leidos is the impending recompete of the VA's Medical Disability Examination (MDE) contract. As noted, the VA's suspension of incentive payments highlights severe administrative and quality-control turbulence within the program. Analysts note that the new Request for Proposal (RFP) may require prime contractors to bid for all six pieces of the contract simultaneously (including four U.S. regions, pre-discharge, and international components), whereas the legacy framework allowed for piecemeal bids (Financial Media) [cite: 17]. If Leidos were to lose its incumbent position—a contract that represents up to 30% of the firm's EPS at a 35% margin—the EPS contraction would be devastating (Financial Media) [cite: 17, 38]. Management remains confident, actively preparing for the re-compete, but the risk remains existential for the health segment.
2. MHS Genesis Integration Phasing
While Leidos secured a $1.13 billion to $1.5 billion sole-source extension to transition MHS Genesis to the cloud through 2028, the explicit strategic intent of the Defense Health Agency is to eliminate Leidos as the Lead Systems Integrator to avoid pass-through costs (Nextgov) [cite: 18, 40, 42]. The DHA's active push to contract directly with Oracle Health, Philips, and Amwell means that post-2028, a multi-billion dollar revenue stream will structurally vanish from Leidos's income statement. The open question is whether the massive $12 billion defense tech pipeline can scale fast enough by 2028 to fully offset this planned health revenue attrition (GuruFocus) [cite: 22, 31].
3. Macro-Political Funding Volatility
As a government contractor, Leidos is beholden to the Congressional appropriations cycle. The company has explicitly warned that a potential government shutdown or a prolonged Continuing Resolution (CR) following the midterm elections could severely disrupt award activity and delay the conversion of its $23 billion proposal pipeline into recognized revenue (GuruFocus) [cite: 22, 31]. Defense budgets are inherently political, and while kinetic munitions enjoy bipartisan support, civilian IT modernization budgets are often the first to be frozen during fiscal standoffs.
4. Margin Dilution from SG&A and Integration
While Adjusted EBITDA margins are robust, GAAP profitability has shown cracks. Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses rose from $217 million to $283 million year-over-year in Q2 2026 (SEC Filings) [cite: 11]. Furthermore, acquisition, integration, and restructuring costs spiked from $2 million to $27 million, largely related to the ENTRUST acquisition and NorthStar 2030 realignment (GovCon Wire) [cite: 11, 20]. While non-GAAP metrics smoothly exclude these costs to show investors the "core" earnings, real cash left the building to pay for these integration frictions.
Conclusion
Leidos's Q2 2026 earnings report paints a picture of a highly competent enterprise skillfully navigating severe cross-currents. The defense segment is firing on all cylinders, winning next-generation kinetic and open-architecture software contracts that perfectly align with the Pentagon's future warfighting vision. Management's ability to wring a record $793 million in operating cash out of the business, rapidly pay down debt, and raise guidance—all while absorbing the total suspension of VA incentive payments—demonstrates exceptional operational leverage. At ~11x forward earnings and an ~9.6x EV/EBITDA multiple, Leidos is priced for stagnation. For investors willing to tolerate the headline risk of the impending VA recompete and the gradual unwinding of the MHS Genesis integration, Leidos represents a deeply discounted, cash-gushing titan in the defense and intelligence sector.
Sources: 1. simplywall.st 2. marketbeat.com 3. koyfin.com 4. tipranks.com 5. stockanalysis.com 6. zacks.com 7. stocktitan.net 8. investing.com 9. leidos.com 10. leidos.com 11. tradingkey.com 12. stockrow.com 13. gurufocus.com 14. simplywall.st 15. Link 16. seekingalpha.com 17. investing.com 18. washingtontechnology.com 19. orangeslices.ai 20. govconwire.com 21. youtube.com 22. biggo.com 23. marketbeat.com 24. prnewswire.com 25. stocknow.ai 26. zacks.com 27. leidos.com 28. marketbeat.com 29. perplexity.ai 30. benzinga.com 31. gurufocus.com 32. leidos.com 33. stockanalysis.com 34. reddit.com 35. gao.gov 36. hillandponton.com 37. vaoig.gov 38. seekingalpha.com 39. leidos.com 40. nextgov.com 41. telecareaware.com 42. sam.gov 43. highergov.com 44. telecareaware.com 45. defensescoop.com 46. seekingalpha.com 47. leidos.com 48. aiplexity.com 49. trefis.com 50. koalagains.com 51. simplywall.st 52. seekingalpha.com 53. caci.com 54. financialcontent.com 55. investing.com 56. stockrow.com 57. valueinvesting.io 58. investing.com 59. valueinvesting.io 60. koalagains.com 61. tradingview.com 62. seekingalpha.com 63. trefis.com 64. beyondspx.com 65. forbes.com 66. govconwire.com 67. koalagains.com 68. biggo.com
